Turntable Do-Over

Sometimes it’s hard to concede that perhaps one of your best ideas ever didn’t work. I had been fooling myself for about a week, and finally had to accept the fact that the turntable ends were not aligning perfectly.

I believe the error crept in when I didn’t clamp the little tongues down to the edge of the pit, but rather relied on gravity to hold the parts down.  It just got too crowded and unwieldy with the clamps on there.  The result was that the bridge admitted about a .010″ twist over its length.  Worse, somehow one end of the bridge was too low.

We have a problem

Maybe alignment would be good enough for coarse scale, but I’m fairly sure the ends were going to be problematic for Proto:87.  So, I eventually screwed up my courage and unsoldered the turntable core to start over again.  I got rid of the end tabs: they were a good idea, but kind of more trouble than they were worth.  I’m not sure exactly how I will affix the ends of the rails now; perhaps Pliobond and spikes will suffice.

The new plan allows for the turntable to float a little vertically, and for the ends of the bridge to be aligned by the ring rail and trucks, just like the real thing.  This is a better plan because a small inaccuracy near the middle of the bridge leads to a big inaccuracy out at the ends (which is also why the radial alignment is best done out at the edge of the lazy susan).  What was I thinking when I set off down that road in the first place?

Tonight, I got the bridge mostly back together again.  It is much flatter now, and there is an opportunity for it to pivot vertically.  I hated to discard the previous hard work, and throwing away the idea was particularly painful, but in the long run, I will be happier with the operation, and that’s what counts.

Turntable do-over

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Turntable Do-Over

  1. Hi Rene,

    Just a thought that occurred to me whilst reading this post. I recall the guys in the South London Group of the Scalefour Society puzzling over the levelling and alignment of their turntable. Their answer, if I recall, was to let the weight of the deck be carried purely by the carrier wheels on the pit rails, and for the central boss to ‘float’ on the spindle with some kind of keyway to apply the turning movement.

    Would this help in your case? If it sounds helpful I can scan their article and send it to you.

    Regards,

    Geraint

    1. Cheers Geraint. It sounds very like some of the commercial solutions on this side of the pond, and most similar to what I’m trying to describe now. I suppose letting the bridge float means that you don’t have to get the ring rail centered, which is an advantage over my latest plan. Floating means either the bridge has to be heavy or there needs to be running clearance on the sides of the spindle. The latter would mean the indexing is going to be inaccurate.
      Thanks for the offer, I reckon it couldn’t hurt to see what others have done with the same challenge!

      1. Article scanned, but not sure where to send it to. Doesn’t appear to be an attachment facility on here. What’s your e-mail address?

        Geraint

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s